|
Anthony Burgess has been heralded as one of the greatest literary
geniuses of the twentieth century. Although Burgess has over thirty
works of published literature, his most famous is A Clockwork Orange.
Burgess’s novel is a futuristic look at a Totalitarian government.
The
main character, Alex, is an “ultra-violent” thief who has no problem
using force against innocent citizens to get what he wants. The
beginning of the story takes us through a night in the life of Alex and
his Droogs, and details their adventures that occupy their time
throughout the night. At fifteen years old, Alex is set up by his
Droogs—Pete, Dim, and Georgie—and is convicted of murder and sent to
jail.
At the Staja or state penitentiary, Alex becomes inmate number
6655321 and spends two years of a sentence of fourteen years there.
Alex is then chosen by the government to undergo an experimental new
“Ludovico’s Technique.” In exchange for his freedom, Alex would partake
in this experiment that was to cure him of all the evil inside of him
and all that was bad. Alex is given injections and made to watch films
of rape, violence, and war and the mixture of these images and the
drugs cause him to associate feelings of panic and nausea with
violence.
He is released after two weeks of the treatment and after a
few encounters with past victims finds himself at the home of a radical
writer who is strongly opposed to the new treatment the government has
subjected him to. Ironically, this writer was also a victim of Alex’s
but does not recognize him. This writer believes that this method robs
the recipient of freedom of choice and moral decision, therefore
depriving him of being a human at all. These themes are played out and
developed throughout the entire novel. Alex eventually tries to commit
suicide and the State is forced to admit that the therapy was a mistake
and they cure him again. The last chapter of the novel which was
omitted from the American version and from Stanley Kubrick’s film shows
Alex’s realization that he is growing up and out of his ultra-violent
ways on his own. He realizes that he wants a wife and son of his own
and that he must move up and on in the world.
Anthony Burgess was born John Anthony Burgess Wilson on February 25,
1917 in Manchester, England. He spoke eight languages, not including
English. Burgess was a composer of music since the age of sixteen
years. He taught himself how to read music and how to play the piano.
The inspiration for A Clockwork Orange came while during World War II,
when his wife was assaulted while he fought. She died about a month
after the incident from internal bleeding, along with their unborn
child, who was killed during the assault. He compensated by releasing
his anger into A Clockwork Orange, in which a scene takes place that
mirrors the traumatic incident. Anthony Burgess died at seventy-six,
November 25, 1993 of cancer (Cohen).
The novel’s main theme deals with free choice and spiritual freedom.
Anthony Burgess expresses his view that no matter how “good” one’s
actions are, unless one has free moral choice, he is spiritually damned
(Malafry). The novel revolves around one criminally minded teen, Alex,
whose world consists of rape, murder, and ruthless violence. Alex is
eventually set up by his “droogs” (friends) and is arrested and jailed.
After some time in jail, Alex is placed in a new rehabilitating program
that uses electro-shock therapy, new medicines, and exposure to violent
film. The program breaks all that Alex holds dear and builds him up
with a new artificial conscience. This part of the novel presents the
reader with a new, reformed Alex, an Alex without free will or freedom
of choice; and Alex that has become a victim. Burgess considers this
lack of freedom to be spiritually murderous and terribly wrong.
Burgess
knows that it is better to choose to be evil, than to be forced to be
good (Kris). Alex is tormented by his new state of oppression. He is
incapable of making any choice; and he must always do that which is
good. Alex is then taken under the wing of a writer who is fighting the
oppressive government. The writer greatly publicizes the oppressive
rehabilitation the state put Alex through. But Alex is still tormented
by his lack of choice. He becomes so tormented that he even attempts
suicide. While Alex is in the hospital following his suicide attempt,
the tragedy of his oppression is highly publicized. In an attempt to
stop public criticism, the state “fixes” Alex. He once again has
freedom of choice. Burgess believes that totalitarian governments take
away one’s individual choice and therefore suffocates his or her soul
(Hausey).
The state in A Clockwork Orange is a general parallel to any
overly oppressive or totalitarian government. By showing what torment
Alex went through when rehabilitated by the state, Burgess shows his
strong sentiment against governments taking away the choice of
individuals, and therefore condemning the individual’s spirit. Burgess
feels that no matter how awful Alex’s actions become, he should be
allowed to choose them (Malafry). To be forced to do good is truly
wrong. If one is forced to do right, and he does what is right, it is
not out of any ethical or moral conviction. When one does what he is
forced to do, he is merely a programmed pawn of the state (Hausey). He
becomes sub-human, and he is merely a robotic existence. But when one
has a choice, he is an individual. When one who is free, chooses good,
it is out of moral conscience and good intent. He chooses to do good.
The good done through free choice is infinitely better than the forced
good of one who is oppressed into morality.
Burgess, through his use of
satire, rebukes the suppression of freedom. His convictions on free
choice and oppression are clearly stated and hidden in the dark satire
of the violent novel. Burgess’s feeling is that there is potentially
more good in a man who deliberately chooses evil, than in one that is
forced to be good. Burgess repeatedly reveals his powerful beliefs that
even the most violent crimes are trivial when compared to the heinous
crime of oppression. He considers it to be a destructive wrong against
one’s spiritual existence. His war is against moral oppression and the
government causing it. His weapon, a powerful one, is his incredible
satiric writing ability.
Outside the sphere of violence, critics had praised Anthony
Burgess’s use of Nadsat more than any other element of A Clockwork
Orange. A Clockwork Orange abandons normal language and is written in
‘Nadsat’ (which means teenager). It is a slang that is spoken by the
teenagers at the time. Burgess uses approximately two-hundred and fifty
‘nadsat’ words—most of which have Russian roots—to convey his story.
This gives the reader a sense of intimacy with Alex and his ‘droogs’
due to the fact that the adults in the novel can’t understand what they
are govoreeting (saying) (Cohen). There is also a disruption of the
flow of narrative aside from this private language. Alex ‘Our Humble
Narrator’ tells the story in a remembering type sequence, but often
interjects with thoughts or questions posed directly at the reader.
Aside from the strange language that is found on the pages of this
novel, one of the most obvious features is Burgess’s ability to shock
(Malafry). There are many different scenes that are quite disturbing
and violent. The reader tends to follow the actions of Alex and his
droogs and it is easy to get caught up in all this violent action and
lose sight of the real meaning of Burgess’s novel. Alex and his droogs
embody all animal instincts and the tale that has been set before the
reader has little respect for realism (Cohen). We are presented with a
world in which the teenagers rule the nights, keeping all real people
in their houses. A world where there are milk bars in which fifteen
year olds can be served with milk that are made with drugs. This is a
world in which Burgess can exaggerate the future problems of society
and reflect upon the absurdity of them.
Another characteristic of this novel is the blurring of normal
understanding, or the frustration of accepted expectations (Kris). Alex
takes every chance to scoff at books, education, and learning. There is
also the lack of guilt in Alex for all of his violent acts. Alex steals
and kills for no other reason than for his own personal pleasure. He
states that he does not steal for the want of money, but for the
pleasure it brings him. Though all of these things are definitely
different from what the reader may expect, the fact that Alex is the
“hero” is probably the most bizarre (Cohen). The reader has relived
each of these horrific incidents with him yet at the end of the novel
the author solicits our sympathy for him since he has become a victim
of the system. Alex obviously is in strong conflict with the norm. He
is a depiction of the ‘bad element’ of society that England was dealing
with at the time that Burgess wrote this novel (Malafry). Alex is the
personification of all that society would like to ignore or eliminate
(Hausey). Aside from pitting Alex against ‘normal’ society, Burgess
uses his story to magnify their decline. He uses this surreal method of
therapy (which was actually being discussed at the time) to show the
dangers of this type of ‘human experiment’. Alex loses his identity
first in prison when he becomes 6655321, and then the therapy
ultimately takes away his ability to choose to do wrong. It can be
argued that the leftist writer in the novel is actually Anthony Burgess
himself. Burgess was greatly opposed to this sort of ‘treatment,’ and
though his own experience mirrored that of the writer in the book
(Burgess’s wife was raped and died due to an intruder in their home
when Burgess was away in WWII) and he was a victim of a person such as
Alex, he still opposed to what he believes to be unethical. Alex does
not treat his friends as equals and is only satisfied with complete
control and a dictator-like position, at one point even referring to
one of his droogs as ‘Dim the soviet.’ This idea is often tested in
physical confrontation. This is one of the recurrent themes of the
novel. Another recurring theme is the repetitive use of certain lines
and phrases to illustrate the repetitiveness of Alex’s life, and the
vicious circle that society has placed him in (Cohen). This serves to
bind the whole of the novel together, even to the final chapter where
‘Our Humble narrator’ is finally ready to break the repetition of
violence and crime.
Burgess’s definition of moral freedom as the ability to perform both
good and evil is presented by implication in his discussion of A
Clockwork Orange. In his introduction, he states that if one “can only
perform good or only perform evil, then he is a clockwork orange,
meaning that he has the appearance of an organism lovely with color and
juice but is in fact only a clockwork toy to be wound up by God of the
Devil or (since this is increasingly replacing both) the Almighty
State” (Kris). Burgess goes on to say, “it is inhuman to be totally
good as it is to be totally evil. The important thing is moral choice.
Evil has to exist along with good, in order that moral choice may
operate.” This hypothetical type of clockwork orange nowhere appears in
the novel because Alex is neither totally good nor totally evil, but a
mixture of both. This remains true even after Alex’s conditioning by
the government. It is true that the government tries to make Alex
totally good through conditioning; however, since it is a coerced
goodness, against Alex’s will, total goodness is not achieved. There
are no morally perfect humans since original sin infects everybody and
willful sin is still possible. Human governments cannot make
individuals morally perfect, or as Dr. Brodsky states, “a true
Christian,” so they should not even try (Malafry). It is the mutual
responsibility of God and the individual to reach moral perfection; the
one giving moral freedom and removing original sin and the other
rightly exercising the freedom to include acceptance of God’s
forgiveness for willful sin (Hausey). “That’s what it’s going to be
then, brothers, as I come to the like end of this tale,” and Alex grows
up and becomes morally responsible. He is no longer a human clockwork
orange.
|
|
|